Cases 111 - 120 of 843
Stein v. R.R. Donnelley & Sons Company et al
as 1:2022cv00903
Plaintiff:
Shiva Stein
Defendant:
R.R. Donnelley & Sons Company, John C. Pope, Irene M. Esteves and others
Ammah v. R. R. Donnelley & Sons Company et al
as 1:2022cv00577
Plaintiff:
Victor Ammah
Defendant:
R. R. Donnelley & Sons Company, John C. Pope, Irene M. Esteves and others
Nationwide Mutual Insurance Company v. Knott County Water and Sewer District
as 7:2022cv00002
Plaintiff:
Nationwide Mutual Insurance Company
Defendant:
Knott County Water and Sewer District
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Property Damage
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv00273
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329
Dent v. Knotts et al
as 3:2021cv00797
Plaintiff:
DeAngelo Demon Dent
Defendant:
Sanford Earl Knotts, Hinds County Sheriff's Department and Mississippi Bar Association
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Knott County, KY v. McKinsey & Company, Inc.
as 3:2021cv09297
Plaintiff:
Knott County, KY
Defendant:
McKinsey & Company Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Knott County, KY v. McKinsey & Company, Inc.
as 7:2021cv00092
Plaintiff:
Knott County, KY
Defendant:
McKinsey & Company, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv02052
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
CASE NUMBER NOT USED
as 1:2021cv02786
Plaintiff:
DAN ALTSCHULD, MARK S AMATO, Cynthia MATSUMOTO and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551
ALTSCHULD et al v. RAIMONDO et al
as 1:2021cv02779
Plaintiff:
DAN ET AL ALTSCHULD, DAN ALTSCHULD, MARK S AMATO and others
Not Classified By Court:
LLOYD J. AUSTIN, III, MERRICK B. GARLAND, ALEJANDRO MAYORKAS and others
Defendant:
Secretary GINA M. RAIMONDO and GINA M. RAIMONDO
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0701
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
