Cases 111 - 120 of 42,701
Michael Owlfeather-Gorbey v. Ian Conners
as 24-6364
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL S. GORBEY
Defendant:
IAN CONNERS, FBOP Central Office Inmate Appeal Administrator
Brown v. Fayette County, West Virginia Prosecuting Attorney
as 2:2024cv00200
Plaintiff:
Robert I. Brown, Jr.
Defendant:
Fayette County, West Virginia Prosecuting Attorney
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Dunmore v. Hamilton et al
as 7:2024cv00134
Plaintiff:
Nathaniel Bruce Dunmore
Defendant:
Clerk Brenda S. Hamilton, Deputy Clerk of Roanoke Circuit Court, Deputy Dillon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Moultrie v. Red Onion State Prison
as 7:2024cv00156
Plaintiff:
Jules Moultrie
Defendant:
Red Onion State Prison and D.O.C./Medical
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dover v. State of South Carolina, The
as 7:2024cv01807
Plaintiff:
Roderick Shawn Dale Dover
Defendant:
State of South Carolina, The
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Timmons v. Smith
as 4:2024cv00937
Plaintiff:
Wondell Timmons, Jr.
Defendant:
Corporal Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr (Other)
Sullivan v. Branch et al
as 3:2024cv00281
Plaintiff:
Ryan J. Sullivan
Defendant:
Lieutenant Branch, Sergeant S. Freeman and Sergeant Gaines
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sterling v. Puryear
as 3:2024cv00280
Plaintiff:
Wesley Sterling
Defendant:
T. Puryear
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ashlock v. Johnson et al
as 1:2024cv00647
Plaintiff:
Marrio Drantrell Ashlock
Defendant:
Amarshay Johnson, Ahtreyonna Holloman and Ty-Quann Alston
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Van Huisen v. House of Representatives, et al
as 1:2024cv00648
Plaintiff:
Greg Van Huisen and Gregory Scott VanHuisen
Defendant:
House of Representatives, et al
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
