Cases 111 - 120 of 19,680
Womble v. Smith et al
as 5:2024ct03078
Plaintiff:
Edward Lamont Womble
Defendant:
Domenick Smith, Lt. Renita Summers, John R. Gray and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Capps v. Hunter et al
as 5:2024ct03079
Plaintiff:
Edward Rummus Capps, III
Defendant:
Sargent T. Hunter, Sargent Farrow and Warden Steven Wadell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Casey et al
as 2:2024cv00101
Plaintiff:
Jasmone Kausvas Smith
Defendant:
Dr. Joseph P. Casey, Colonel Jeffrey S. Katz, S.M. Holt and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Crockett v. Warden
as 5:2024cv00084
Plaintiff:
Timmy A. Crockett
Defendant:
Warden
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Carlos Hernandez v. Dean Locklear
as 24-6157
Plaintiff:
CARLOS HERNANDEZ, a/k/a Ra Saadi Lennox Hernandez El
Defendant:
DEAN LOCKLEAR, Superintendent/Warden of Scotland Correctional Institution, in their individual and official capacity, JOHN DOE, Sergeant, (SRG) Staff-Officer, in their individual and official capacity, JOHN DOE, Sergeant, Walker, Staff-Officer, in their individual and official capacity and others
Mark Foster, Jr. v. Warren Alexander
as 24-6313
Plaintiff:
MARK BRIAN FOSTER, JR.
Defendant:
WARREN ALEXANDER, BRYANT POOLE and CORRECTIONAL OFFICERS, Eastern Correctional
Collins v. Burdette et al
as 2:2024cv00960
Plaintiff:
Robbie Collins
Defendant:
Samantha Burdette, Nurse Driver and Dr. McCree
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Mickens v. Henrico County Sheriff Department
as 2:2024cv00125
Plaintiff:
Tyshawn Mickens
Defendant:
Henrico County Sheriff Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Forrest v. United States of America
as 9:2024cv00901
Plaintiff:
Kevin Forrest
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
