Cases 111 - 120 of 4,554
Clarence Fry v. Tim Shoop
as 23-3270
Petitioner / Appellant:
CLARENCE FRY
Respondent / Appellee:
TIM SHOOP, Warden
Paul Speer v. Staci Ibarra, et al
as 23-99003
Petitioner / Appellant:
PAUL BRADLEY SPEER
Respondent / Appellee:
STACI IBARRA, Warden, Arizona State Prison - Eyman Complex and RYAN THORNELL, Director of the Arizona Department of Corrections
Frazier v. Warden of Lieber
as 5:2023cv00953
Petitioner:
Sharod Frazier
Respondent:
Warden of Lieber
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Sievers v. Secretary, Department of Corrections (Lee County)
as 2:2023cv00237
Petitioner:
Mark D. Sievers
Respondent:
Secretary, Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Sievers v. Secretary, Department of Corrections (Lee County)
as 3:2023cv00373
Petitioner:
Mark D. Sievers
Respondent:
SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, STATE OF FLORIDA and Secretary, Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
GIBSON III v. NEAL
as 1:2023cv00330
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM CLYDE GIBSON III
Defendant:
RON NEAL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Gay v. Payne
as 6:2023cv06011
Petitioner:
Randy William Gay
Respondent:
Dexter Payne
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Ptn for Writ of H/C - Stay of Execution
In re: Anthony Apanovitch
as 23-3149
Petitioner:
In re: ANTHONY C. APANOVITCH
Respondent:
TIM SHOOP, Warden
Alfonso Blake v. William Gittere, et al
as 23-99001
Petitioner / Appellant:
ALFONSO MANUEL BLAKE
Respondent / Appellee:
WILLIAM GITTERE and CATHERINE CORTEZ MASTO, Attorney General
Margaret A. Allen v. Secretary, Department of Corrections, et al
as 23-10447
Petitioner / Appellant:
MARGARET A ALLEN
Respondent / Appellee:
SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF FLORIDA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
