Cases 121 - 130 of 1,235
KAYA v. CHERTOFF et al
as 2:2008cv03190
Plaintiff:
MUSLECHITDIN KAYA
Defendant:
MICHAEL CHERTOFF, EMILIO GONZALEZ and EVANGELIA KLAPAKIS
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Gyamfi v. Dibbins et al
as 1:2008cv00695
Petitioner:
Clement Gyamfi
Respondent:
Susan P. Dibbins, Emilio Gonzalez, Michael Chertoff and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Hassan Shamdeen v. Michael Mukasey, et al
as 08-35573
Plaintiff - Appellee:
HASSAN SHAMDEEN
Defendant - Appellant:
MICHAEL B. MUKASEY, Attorney General, Attorney General of the United States, MICHAEL CHERTOFF, Secretary of the Department of Homeland Security, ROBERT S. MUELLER, III, Director, Federal Bureau of Investigations and others
Mohammad v. Dibbins et al
as 1:2008cv00696
Petitioner:
Alan Mohammad
Respondent:
Susan P. Dibbins, Emilio Gonzalez, Michael Chertoff and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Khan v. Mukasey et al
as 2:2008cv00999
Plaintiff:
Mohammad Ali Khan
Defendant:
Michael Mukasey, Michael Chertoff, Robert Mueller and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2008cv11087
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2008cv11088
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2008cv05715
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Fed. Question: Other
Remi Njoku v. Eric Holder, Jr.
as 08-1688
Petitioner:
REMI CHIDE NJOKU
Respondent:
MICHAEL B. MUKASEY, United States Attorney General, ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., United States Attorney General, MICHAEL CHERTOFF, Secretary, U.S. Department of Homeland Security and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2008cv03240
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
