Cases 121 - 130 of 197
Leonard Clark v. John Does, et al
as 19-5568
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LEONARD CLARK
Defendant / Appellee:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, BEVERLY BARRON, Assistant Warden, JENNIFER WEST, Physicians Assistant and others
Lazano v. USA et al
as 1:2019cv01181
Defendant:
Shane Johnson, Ian Connors, USA and others
Plaintiff:
Juan Amaya Lazano
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
ESCOBAR-OREJUELA v. BELL et al
as 2:2019cv00248
Defendant:
J. R. BELL and IAN CONNOR
Plaintiff:
JOSE ESCOBAR-OREJUELA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Vernon Earle v. Shreves
as 19-6655
Defendant / Appellee:
MR. BRECKON, Assistance Warden of Operations, MR. GONOUNDY, [SIA] Special Investigative Agent, SHREVES, C/O and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
VERNON NORMAN EARLE
AHMED v. FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS et al
as 1:2019cv01189
Defendant:
FRANK LARA, IAN CONNORS, SARA M. REVELL and others
Plaintiff:
FAROOQUE AHMED
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
Iglesias v. True et al
as 3:2019cv00415
Plaintiff:
Christian Noel Iglesias, Christina Nichole Iglesias, Cristian Noel Iglesias and others
Defendant:
Ian Connors, Deborah Schult, Donald Trump and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Landis v. Ebbert, et al
as 1:2019cv00470
Defendant:
J. Roy Ormand, Ian Connors, Bureau of Prisons and others
Plaintiff:
Carlton Theodore Landis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
CLERVRAIN v. SAMUEL et al
as 1:2019cv00468
Defendant:
SEAN R O'NEIL, IAN CONNORS, MATT HUREL and others
Plaintiff:
MANETIRONY CLERVRAIN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Neal v. Warden
as 7:2019cv00139
Petitioner:
Denard Darnell Neal
Respondent:
Warden and Ian Connors
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Carlos Alberto Hernandez v. The County of Los Angeles et al
as 2:2019cv00586
Defendant:
Metropolitan Detention Center, Ian Connors, D. Ephraim and others
Plaintiff:
Carlos Alberto Hernandez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
