Cases 121 - 130 of 254
Roberts v. Prudential Insurance Company of America
as 2:2014cv00566
Plaintiff:
Ennis R. Roberts
Defendant:
Prudential Insurance Company of America
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Roberts v. C. R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2014cv02074
Plaintiff:
Rose M. Roberts and Margaret R. Roberts
Defendant:
C. R. Bard, Inc. and Sofradim Production SAS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Meeks v. Dunn et al
as 3:2014cv00089
Plaintiff:
Frederic D. Meeks
Defendant:
Joseph Walter Dunn, Joseph R. Roberts, David T. Nielsen and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77
Cornwell Quality Tools Company v. Roberts et al
as 2:2013cv14936
Plaintiff:
Cornwell Quality Tools Company
Defendant:
Kenneth R Roberts, Jr and Roberts Tool Distriution, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2013cv00472
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1080
Roberts v. Sotelo-Guanespen et al
as 4:2013cv00059
Defendant:
Argonaut Insurance Co., City of Presidio, Texas and Estate of Rodolfo Noe Sotelo-Guanespen
Plaintiff:
Steven R Roberts
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
Roberts v. Boston Scientific Corporation
as 2:2013cv21277
Plaintiff:
Tammy R. Roberts
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Roberts et al v. American Medical Systems, Inc.
as 2:2013cv21189
Plaintiff:
Carla R. Roberts and Paul E. Roberts
Defendant:
American Medical Systems, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Roberts et al v. American Medical Systems, Inc.
as 0:2013cv01848
Plaintiff:
Carla R. Roberts and Paul E. Roberts
Defendant:
American Medical Systems, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Roberts et al v. American Medical Systems, Inc.
as MN/0:13-cv-01848
Plaintiff:
Carla R. Roberts and Paul E. Roberts
Defendant:
American Medical Systems, Inc.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
