Cases 121 - 130 of 230
Natural Resources Defense Coun, et al v. Penny Pritzker, et al
as 14-16375
Plaintiff - Appellant:
NATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL, INC., THE HUMANE SOCIETY OF THE UNITED STATES, CETACEAN SOCIETY INTERNATIONAL and others
Defendant - Appellee:
PENNY PRITZKER, Secretary, U.S. Department of Commerce, NATIONAL MARINE FISHERIES SERVICE, EILEEN SOBECK, Assistant Administrator for Fisheries and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv00170
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Initiative and Referendum Inst, et al v. USPS
as 14-5089
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Initiative and Referendum Institute, Citizens for Limited Taxation, Humane Society of the United States and others
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Nebraskans for Limited Terms, Oregonians for Fair Elections, Barbara C. Anderson and others
Defendant - Appellee:
United States Postal Service
Chinatown Neighborhood Associa, et al v. Kamala Harris, et al
as 14-15781
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CHINATOWN NEIGHBORHOOD ASSOCIATION, a nonprofit corporation and ASIAN AMERICANS FOR POLITICAL ADVANCEMENT, a political action committee
Defendant - Appellee:
KAMALA HARRIS, Attorney General of the State of California and CHARLTON H. BONHAM, Director, California Department of Fish and Game
Intervenor-Defendant - Appellee:
THE HUMANE SOCIETY OF THE UNITED STATES, MONTEREY BAY AQUARIUM FOUNDATION and ASIAN PACIFIC AMERICAN OCEAN HARMONY ALLIANCE
California Sea Urchin Comm., et al v. Rachel Jacobson, et al
as 14-55580
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CALIFORNIA SEA URCHIN COMMISSION, CALIFORNIA ABALONE ASSOCIATION, CALIFORNIA LOBSTER AND TRAP FISHERMEN'S ASSOCIATION and others
Intervenor-Defendant:
FRIENDS OF THE SEA OTTER, HUMANE SOCIETY OF THE UNITED STATES, DEFENDERS OF WILDLIFE and others
Defendant - Appellee:
RACHEL JACOBSON, in her official capacity as Acting Assistant Secretary for Fish and Wildlife & Parks, Department of Interior, DANIEL M. ASHE, in his official capacity as Director of the United States Fish and Wildlife Service and UNITED STATES FISH & WILDLIFE SERVICE
The Humane Society of the United States et al v. National Marine Fisheries Service et al
as 1:2014cv11754
Plaintiff:
The Humane Society of the United States , Center for Biological Diversity , Defenders of Wildlife and others
Defendant:
National Marine Fisheries Service, John K. Bullard, Eileen Sobeck and others
Cause Of Action: 16 U.S.C. § 1538
Puppies 'N Love et al v. Phoenix, City of
as 2:2014cv00073
Defendant:
Phoenix, City of
Plaintiff:
Puppies 'N Love , Frank Mineo and Vicki Mineo
Intervenor_defendant:
The Humane Society of the United States
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Constitutionality of State Statute(s)
ASSOCIATED DOG CLUBS OF NEW YORK STATE, INC. et al v. VILSACK et al
as 1:2013cv01982
Plaintiff:
ASSOCIATED DOG CLUBS OF NEW YORK STATE, INC. , AUSTRALIAN SHEPHERD CLUB OF AMERICA , AMERICAN DOG BREEDERS ASSOCIATION, INC. and others
Defendant:
THOMAS J. VILSACK and UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Movant:
HUMANE SOCIETY OF THE UNITED STATES
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
Front Range Equine, et al v. Vilsack, et al
as 13-2187
Plaintiff - Appellant:
FRONT RANGE EQUINE RESCUE, THE HUMANE SOCIETY OF THE UNITED STATES, C/O JAMES W. HUBBELL, MARIN HUMANE SOCIETY and others
Defendant - Appellee:
TOM VILSACK, Secretary U.S. Department of Agriculture, ELIZABETH A. HAGEN, Under Secretary for Food Safety, U.S. Department of Agriculture and ALFRED A. ALMANZA, Administrator, Food Safety and Inspection Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture
Defendant-Intervenor - Appellee:
RESPONSIBLE TRANSPORTATION, LLC, CONFEDERATED TRIBES AND BANDS OF THE YAKAMA NATION, RAINS NATURAL MEATS and others
Van Dusen v. City of Oakland et al
as 3:2013cv05023
Plaintiff:
Jan Van Dusen
Defendant:
City of Oakland, Kyle Thomas, Michael Valladon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
