Cases 131 - 140 of 3,908
United States of America v. 14980 dollars in US Currency
as 7:2023cv00122
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
14980 dollars in US Currency
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345 Complaint for Forfeiture
Johnson v. United States of America
as 1:2023cv00080
Plaintiff:
Teraino A. Johnson
Defendant:
United States of America
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. 2016 LEXUS ES350, VIN JTHBK1GG7G2215108
as 1:2023cv00020
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
2016 LEXUS ES350, VIN JTHBK1GG7G2215108
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 881 Forfeiture Property-Drugs
United States of America v. Ruger Super Redhawk Revolver et al
as 8:2022cv04611
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Ruger Super Redhawk Revolver, Canik55 TP-9 Elite Pistol, HS Produkt (IM Metal) XD40 Pistol and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345 Complaint for Forfeiture
US v. Jermaine Sanders
as 22-2290
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Claimant:
JERMAINE LYDELL SANDERS
Defendant:
$16,761 IN UNITED STATES CURRENCY, seized from Jermaine Lydell Sanders on in Mooresville, NC
United States of America v. One 2018 Lexus LS500
as 3:2022cv00679
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
One 2018 Lexus LS500
United States of America v. $36,573.00 In U.S. Currency
as 5:2022cv00311
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
$36,573.00 In U.S. Currency
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1355 Petition for Return of Property
Christopher Mosby v. US
as 22-7393
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CHRISTOPHER MOSBY
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
United States of America v. Approximately $44,875 in United States Currency
as 3:2022cv00637
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Approximately $44,875 in United States Currency
Claimant:
Dymond Thomas
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. CURRENCY $5,853.00 IN U.S.
as 1:2022cv00999
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
CURRENCY $5,853.00 IN U.S.
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 0981 Civil Forfeiture - Gambling, etc.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
