Cases 131 - 140 of 45,207
Holmes v. North Vista Hospital Dr. Gregory Piestrupt
as 2:2024cv01544
Defendant:
North Vista Hospital Dr. Gregory Piestrupt
Plaintiff:
David Holmes
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2024cv61531
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
RELIABLE TRUCKING GROUP, INC. et al v. CHOUEN et al
as 2:2024cv08619
Defendant:
GREGORY MEJIA, THE ROUTE STORE, ACZA TRUCKING, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
JOHN WALTER and RELIABLE TRUCKING GROUP, INC.
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 22 Securities Fraud
Banks v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2024cv00230
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
SSA
Plaintiff:
Gregory A Banks
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 427 Social Security Benefits
Wallace v. Worth et al
as 5:2024cv00862
Defendant:
FNU LNU, Adriana Worth and HSA Staff Services
Plaintiff:
Gregory L Wallace
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Hughes v. EK Real Estate Fund I, LLC
as 6:2024cv01378
Plaintiff:
Gregory R. Hughes
Defendant:
EK Real Estate Fund I, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1601 Truth in Lending
CAMPBELL v. USA
as 1:2024cv01290
Plaintiff:
GREGORY C. CAMPBELL
Defendant:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1491 Tucker Act
Webb v. Lee et al
as 1:2024cv03670
Plaintiff:
Gregory Ryan Webb
Defendant:
Jessica Hill and Bill Lee
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
JACKSON v. SAMPSON et al
as 4:2024cv00116
Respondent:
WARDEN GREGORY SAMPSON, WARDEN ANGELA REAVES and GEORGIA, STATE OF
Petitioner:
MALCOLM J JACKSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Damm v. Dallas County Jail
as 3:2024cv02132
Plaintiff:
Gregory Paul Damm
Defendant:
Dallas County Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
