Cases 131 - 140 of 19,525
Patrick Carmody v. TDOC, et al
as 24-5243
Plaintiff:
PATRICK S. CARMODY
Defendant:
TDOC, FRANK STRADA, Commissioner, in his individual and official capacities, LEE DOTSON, Asst. Commissioner, in his official and individual capacities and others
Long v. Foster Wheeler Energy Corporation, et al.
as 24-1557
Plaintiff:
RICHARD D. LONG
Defendant:
FOSTER WHEELER ENERGY CORPORATION, 3M COMPANY, A.W. CHESTERTON COMPANY and others
In Re: TikTok, Inc., Consumer Privacy Litigation
as 1:2024cv02110
Defendant:
Beijing Douyin Information Service Co. Ltd, Douyin Ltd., TikTok Inc and others
Not Yet Classified:
TikTok, Inc., Consumer Privacy Litigation
Plaintiff:
Anibeth Bravo, Katie Murphy, Artemis Buckley and others
Murphy v. Officer Kopps(Inmate 1)
as 2:2024cv00168
Plaintiff:
Joseph Lee Murphy
Defendant:
Officer Kopps
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Traylor v. Pacciuco LLC
as 24-691
Plaintiff:
SYLVESTER TRAYLOR
Defendant:
TOWN OF WATERFORD, LAW OFFICE OF LLOYD LANGHAMMER, LLC, PHH MORTGAGE CORPORATION and others
Murphy v. Syngenta AG et al
as 3:2024pq00713
Special Master:
Randi Ellis
Plaintiff:
Michael Murphy
Defendant:
Syngenta AG, Syngenta Crop Protection, LLC, Chevron USA, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Black v. Murphy et al
as 2:2024cv10634
Plaintiff:
Yvonne Black and Yvonne Black [E-filer]
Defendant:
Michael J. Murphy, Jason Pless, Reginald Van Wulfen and others
Holloman v. White et al
as 7:2024cv00188
Plaintiff:
Shavis Holloman
Defendant:
Rick White, D. Turner, Fuller and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Murphy v. City of Elmira
as 24-660
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER M. MURPHY
Defendant:
OTTAVIO CAMPANELLA, MATTHEW BUZZETTI, TIMOTHY OVERLY and others
Murphy v. Rigsby
as 4:2024cv00924
Plaintiff:
Jacob Earl Murphy
Defendant:
Bobby Rigsby
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
