Cases 141 - 150 of 16,902
Flemons (PS) v. Gates
as 1:2024cv01316
Plaintiff:
Joanna Flemons
Defendant:
Bill Gates
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00674
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1681 Title IX Educational Amendments 1992
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv03557
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
MACDONALD v. JOHNSON et al
as 2:2024cv00161
Plaintiff:
KINLEY MACDONALD
Defendant:
DANIEL JOHNSON, BRUCE KILE, BOARD OF OVERSEERS OF THE BAR and others
Not Yet Classified:
MAINE ATTORNEY GENERAL - PRISONER CASES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Moore v. City of Edina et al
as 0:2024cv01109
Plaintiff:
Kyle Robert Moore
Defendant:
City of Edina, Jason Behr, Jefferey Martin and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00213
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Lemke et al v. Change Healthcare Inc. et al
as 3:2024cv00302
Plaintiff:
Sara Lemke, Revival Therapy, P.C., EA Health Holdings, Inc. and others
Defendant:
Change Healthcare Inc., UnitedHealth Group Inc., UnitedHealthcare Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Phillips v. Henderson
as 2:2024cv00859
Plaintiff:
T. Matthew Phillips
Defendant:
Bill Henderson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
MacDonald et al v. Johnson et al
as 3:2024cv00372
Plaintiff:
Kinley MacDonald, AJ, BM and others
Defendant:
Daniel Johnson, Bruce Kile, Bar Counsel Members and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Butler v. Hyatte et al
as 3:2024cv00342
Defendant:
William Hyatte, Bill, Pully and others
Plaintiff:
Imari Butler
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
