Cases 141 - 150 of 873
Economou v. Washington State Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2021cv05086
Defendant:
Washington State Department of Corrections and Dustin Richey
Plaintiff:
Brett A Economou
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Mitchell v. Allison et al
as 3:2021cv00138
Plaintiff:
John Edward Mitchell
Defendant:
David Skaggs, L. Eshelman, Laurie Maurino and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Richey v. Fletcher
as 4:2021cv00019
Defendant:
Jeffery K. Fletcher
Plaintiff:
Adam Lee Richey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Richey v. Holden et al
as 4:2021cv00020
Defendant:
Billy Parker, Jay Holden, Unknown Female Polygraph Examiner and others
Plaintiff:
Adam Lee Richey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2020cv01031
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
RICHEY v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2020cv13683
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
JUSTIN RICHEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
RICHEY-HARRIS v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
as 3:2020cv17686
Plaintiff:
PATSEY LEA RICHEY-HARRIS
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER INC, JOHNSON & JOHNSON and PERSONAL CARE PRODUCTS COUNCIL
In Re:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON TALCUM POWDER PRODUCTS MARKETING, SALES PRACTICES AND PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Doe v. Grand Villa of New Port Richey et al
as 8:2020cv02814
Defendant:
GRAND VILLA OF NEW PORT RICHEY, l/b/n GV NEW PORT RICHEY, LLC, DFGV Holdings, Inc., IND-Ormond, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
946 Jane Doe and Jane Doe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Mike Redford v. USDC-CALA
as 20-73469
Not Classified By Court:
In re: MIKE REDFORD, RAJEEV V. DATE, Director, individual capacity, PHILIP LERMA, official capacity and others
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, LOS ANGELES
Petitioner:
MIKE REDFORD
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
