Cases 141 - 150 of 134,063
Wallace v. South Carolina, State of
as 5:2024cv02313
Petitioner:
Kaiwah Shawn Wallace
Respondent:
South Carolina, State of
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (County)
Gregory Green v. Jimmy Richardson, II
as 24-6379
Plaintiff:
GREGORY GREEN
Defendant:
JIMMY A. RICHARDSON, II, Fifteenth Circuit Solicitor and MICHAEL TRAVIS HYMAN, Assistant Solicitor, Horry County
Larry Blakney v. Merrick Garland
as 24-6377
Petitioner:
LARRY BLAKNEY
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General of U.S. and WARDEN THOMAS SCARANTINO
Ronald Sutherland, Jr. v. State of North Carolina
as 24-6378
Petitioner:
RONALD KEITH SUTHERLAND, JR.
Respondent:
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA and WARDEN
Terrence Hammock v. Zowie Barnes
as 24-6375
Plaintiff:
TERRENCE EDWARD HAMMOCK, JR.
Defendant:
DR. ZOWIE BARNES, M.D., DIRECTOR GAIL WATTS, OFFICER J. SHERMAN and others
Anthony Hoover v. Stephen Waddell
as 24-6376
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY LEON HOOVER
Defendant:
STEPHEN WADDELL, Warden IV sued in individual and official capacity, ROY A. COOPER, III, Governor sued in individual and official capacity, ELIZABETH N. STRICKLAND, State Asst. District Attorney sued in individual and official capacity and others
Blackwell v. Southwest Virginia Regional Jail Authority
as 7:2024cv00142
Plaintiff:
Matthew Don Blackwell
Defendant:
Southwest Virginia Regional Jail Authority
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01181
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Charles v. USA
as 1:2024cv00125
Petitioner:
Roger Dale Charles, II
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Osborne v. USA
as 5:2024cv00107
Petitioner:
Pamela Ladawn Councill Osborne
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
