Cases 141 - 150 of 375,237
Nolan v. Davis et al
as 5:2024cv00487
Plaintiff:
Edford Ray Nolan, Jr
Defendant:
Bradley Davis and Enid Police Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2024cv02059
Plaintiff:
Malik Williams
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, PHILADELPHIA DEPARTMENT OF PRISONS, CURRAN-FROMHOLD CORRECTIONAL FACILITY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Austin #362933 v. Pima County Jail et al
as 4:2024cv00242
Plaintiff:
Elijah James Austin
Defendant:
Pima County Jail, Unknown Reyes and Unknown Hendricks
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Russell v. Fowler et al
as 4:2024cv00432
Plaintiff:
Derrick Russell
Defendant:
Lea Ellen Fowler, Ola B Lackey, Eric S Higgins and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Valencia v. Machado et al
as 1:2024cv00569
Plaintiff:
Edwin Valencia
Defendant:
L. Machado, J. Tyree, H. Ortega and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Ainsworth v. Hunter
as 2:2024cv01347
Plaintiff:
Tyrell Ainsworth
Defendant:
R. Hunter
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Daniel v. Nelson et al
as 2:2024cv01358
Plaintiff:
Dajon Daniel
Defendant:
E. Bradley Nelson and Malary Getty
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Richard v. CHCF et al
as 2:2024cv01368
Plaintiff:
Craig Richard
Defendant:
CHCF, Richardson, Grant and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Brown v. Hernandez et al
as 2:2024cv01366
Plaintiff:
Terence Brown
Defendant:
Daniel Hernandez, Mekhi Mendoza, Cesar Sosa and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Bennett v. Parales et al
as 2:2024cv01367
Plaintiff:
Mario Bennett
Defendant:
Parales and Warden
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
