Cases 161 - 170 of 191
Rodriguez v. City of Stockton et al
as 2:2010cv00204
Plaintiff:
Steven R. Rodriguez
Defendant:
City of Stockton, Richard Ridenour, Timothy Swails and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
James Phillip Barnett v. Kimberly-clark Corporation, et al.
as PAE/2:09-CV-71036
Defendant:
Kimberly-clark Corporation
Plaintiff:
James Phillip Barnett
James Phillip Barnett v. Licoln Electric Co., et al.
as PAE/2:09-CV-71137
Defendant:
Licoln Electric Co
Plaintiff:
James Phillip Barnett
Phillips v. Henderson et al
as 1:2009cv02569
Petitioner:
Willie James Phillips
Respondent:
Tony Henderson and Thurbert E. Baker
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Type:
Other Statutes
Charles Brock v. James Kerley, et al
as 09-5878
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CHARLES BROCK
Defendant - Appellee:
JAMES PHILLIP KERLEY, Attorney at Law and OTIS HIGGS, Judge in Division 2 at the Criminal Court of Shelby County Tennessee
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2009cv00655
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
USA v. James Phillip
as 09-2038
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
JAMES PHILLIPS
BARNETT v. LINCOLN ELECTRIC COMPANY et al
as 2:2009cv64918
Plaintiff:
JAMES PHILLIP BARNETT
Defendant:
LINCOLN ELECTRIC COMPANY, KIMBERLY-CLARK CORPORATION, BOC GROUP, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
MOE v. SETON HALL UNIVERSITY
as 2:2009cv01424
Plaintiff:
ALLISON MOE
Defendant:
SETON HALL UNIVERSITY, BRIAN B. SHULMAN, JOSEPH MONOCO and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Brock v. Kerley et al
as 2:2009cv02186
Plaintiff:
Charles Brock
Defendant:
James Phillip Kerley and Otis Higgs
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
