Cases
Cases 161 - 170 of 4,885
Stanley v. Kalamazoo, City of et al
as 1:2024cv00145
Plaintiff: Benjamin Stanley
Defendant: City of Kalamazoo, Integrated Services of Kalamazoo, Bronson Methodist Hospital and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Other Civil Rights
Pena v. White et al
as 1:2024cv01082
Plaintiff: Augusto Antonio Pena
Defendant: Harvey White and JB Hunt Transportation Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity Action
Pena v. United States of America We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2024cv01266
Plaintiff: Jose Pena
Defendant: United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Martinez Pena v. Garland
as 24-728
Petitioner: WILLIAM MARTINEZ PENA
Respondent: MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Robert Ennen v. Pedro Pena et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2024cv01136
Plaintiff: Robert Ennen
Defendant: Pedro Pena, Ian Dixon and Does 1 to 10, Inclusive
Pena v. Oregon Health And Science University
as 24-648
Plaintiff / Appellant: STEPHANIE PENA
Defendant / Appellee: OREGON HEALTH AND SCIENCE UNIVERSITY, an independent public corporation
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00654
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans w/ Disabilities Act (ADA)
Guzman v. City of Houston et al
as 4:2024cv00419
Plaintiff: Guadalupe Guzman
Defendant: City of Houston and Samuel Pena
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00666
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
Pena v. Dart et al
as 1:2024cv01038
Plaintiff: Eduardo Pena
Defendant: Thomas Dart, Ofc Araiza, Ofc Verdin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?