Cases 11 - 20 of 1,183,395
Caruthers v. Rockingham Regional Jail Medical Department et al
as 7:2024cv00291
Plaintiff:
William H. Caruthers
Defendant:
Rockingham Regional Jail Medical Department, Officer Perez, Officer Morbin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jaramillo v. Wilkens et al
as 1:2024cv00416
Plaintiff:
Jason Allen Jaramillo
Defendant:
FNU Wilkens, Jacob LNU and Alisha Tafoya
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Shelton v. Watwood et al
as 1:2024cv01097
Plaintiff:
James Michael Shelton
Defendant:
Brandon Watwood, Frank Strada, Danny H. Goodman, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. Oklahoma County Jail
as 5:2024cv00441
Plaintiff:
Christopher Lee Johnson
Defendant:
Oklahoma County Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hernandez v. Rokosky
as 1:2024cv00225
Plaintiff:
Marco Hernandez
Defendant:
E. Rokosky
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv21698
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Aikens v. Rocket Mortgage
as 5:2024cv00575
Plaintiff:
Daniel Dewayne Aikens
Defendant:
Rocket Mortgage
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lindell, Nate v. Carr, Kevin et al
as 3:2024cv00287
Plaintiff:
Nate A. Lindell
Defendant:
Kevin A. Carr, Sarah Cooper, Douglas G. Percy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
CLEGG v. WALTON COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE et al
as 3:2024cv00034
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL WAYNE CLEGG
Defendant:
WALTON COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE and CORRECT HEALTH
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Juarez v. Bureau of Prisons
as 5:2024cv00111
Petitioner:
Luis Jesus Juarez
Respondent:
Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
