Cases 11 - 20 of 8,734
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv04215
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv03674
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
GFRS Equipment Leasing Fund II, LLC, LLC v. RNM Underground Corp. et al
as 1:2024cv00070
Plaintiff:
GFRS Equipment Leasing Fund II, LLC
Defendant:
RNM Underground Corp., Nicanor Ramirez, Javier Alfredo Ramirez and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
United States of America v. Levy (Nunez)
as 24-1376
Not Yet Classified:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
KEILY NUNEZ, JULIEN LEVY, IVAN SANTOS and others
Santos-Bey et al v. Brown et al
as 1:2024cv01490
Petitioner:
Erick Santos-Bey and Lawrence H. Morgan
Respondent:
Anthony Brown and Carlos Bivens
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00879
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12102 Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) Disability Definition
Carrero Silva v. State of New York
as 24-1330
Plaintiff:
SANTO CARRERO SILVA
Defendant:
STATE OF NEW YORK and MARK DUANE LENTINI, Dr.; Albany Medical
Alfredo Ramirez et al v. AMPAM Parks Mechanical, Inc. et al
as 5:2024cv01038
Plaintiff:
Alfredo Ramirez and Ramn Santos Castro
Defendant:
AMPAM Parks Mechanical, Inc., Charles E. Parks, III, John D. Parks and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.
Willie Robinson v. Wexford Health Sources, Inc., et al
as 24-1855
Plaintiff:
WILLIE R. ROBINSON
Defendant:
WEXFORD HEALTH SOURCES, INC., ROB JEFFREYS, MATTHEW C. SWALLS and others
Willis v. City of Bakersfield, et al.
as 24-3154
Plaintiff:
BYRON WILLIS
Defendant:
CITY OF BAKERSFIELD and SANTOS LUEVANO
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
