Cases 11 - 20 of 683
Busto v. Hughes
as 4:2023cv04508
Plaintiff:
Chad Michael Busto and C.M. Busto
Defendant:
Lynn N Hughes
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Keeley Abram et al v. City of Los Angeles, California
as 2:2023cv09565
Plaintiff:
Keeley Abram, Robert Aceves, Brian Acosta and others
Defendant:
City of Los Angeles, California
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0207 Maximum Hours
Busto v. Hughes
as 4:2023cv04339
Plaintiff:
Chad Busto
Defendant:
Judge Lynn N Hughes
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Montoya et al v. Federal Emergency Management Agency et al
as 1:2023cv00977
Plaintiff:
Michelle Montoya, Candace Seaverns, Joseph Seaverns and others
Defendant:
Federal Emergency Management Agency, National Resources Conservation Services and Angela Gladwell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgment
Conchas-Bustos v. Garland
as 23-9594
Petitioner / Appellant:
EUSTAQUIO CONCHAS-BUSTOS
Respondent / Appellee:
MERRICK GARLAND
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv03191
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Bustos v. Warden
as 2:2023cv00488
Petitioner:
Jair Alejandr Bustos
Respondent:
Warden and Justin Andrews, Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Bustos-Cardenas v. Garland
as 23-7161
Petitioner:
JUAN CARLOS BUSTOS-CARDENAS, NELLY AMADA SANCHEZ-ZHIMINAICELA, CHRISTINE MONSTSERRAT BUSTOS-SANCHEZ and others
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL
BUSTOS v. 3M COMPANY
as 7:2023cv01476
Plaintiff:
MANUEL ALEXANDER BUSTOS
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Solano v. Warden, FCC Coleman - Low
as 5:2023cv00563
Petitioner:
Alejandrino Bustos Solano
Respondent:
Warden, FCC Coleman - Low
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
