Cases 11 - 20 of 2,438
Woods v. Beazley Insurance Company et al
as 5:2024cv00078
Plaintiff:
Michael Woods
Defendant:
Beazley Insurance Company, Truckers Service Association, TrueNorth Companies, L.C. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Miller v. Duffy et al
as 6:2024cv02268
Plaintiff:
Chavis T Miller
Defendant:
Lt Susan Duffy, Magon Toth, E Cowley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Duffy v. Amazon.com.ca, Inc. et al
as 5:2024cv00553
Plaintiff:
Rebecca Duffy
Defendant:
Amazon.com.ca, Inc., Amazon.com Sales, Inc., Amazon.com Services, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Phillips v. Perkins et al
as 1:2024cv01949
Plaintiff:
Joshua Lee Phillips
Defendant:
Sergeant Miles Perkins, Sergeant Steven Fleshman, Sergeant Nicholas Beach and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Duffy v. Indivior, Inc. et al.
as 1:2024sf65215
Plaintiff:
Michael J Duffy
Defendant:
Indivior, Inc., Indivior Solutions, Inc., Indivior PLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Faberman v. Jetset Automotive LLC et al
as 9:2024cv80439
Plaintiff:
Roland Faberman
Defendant:
Jetset Automotive LLC and DUFFY'S CLASSIC CARS, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Faberman v. JETSET AUTOMOTIVE LLC et al
as 9:2024cv80436
Plaintiff:
Ronald Faberman
Defendant:
JETSET AUTOMOTIVE LLC and DUFFY'S CLASSIC CARS, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Cricket Film LLC v. Duffy
as 5:2024cv00343
Plaintiff:
Cricket Film LLC
Defendant:
Tameson Duffy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Constitutionality of State Statute(s)
Riley v. Hall-Hipkins et al
as 1:2024cv00429
Plaintiff:
Dawn Marie Riley
Defendant:
Cierra Hall-Hipkins, Sue Ryan, Katherine Jennings and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
