Cases 11 - 20 of 107
81-20 Grain, LLC v. Guthmiller et al
as 8:2022cv00329
Plaintiff:
81-20 Grain, LLC
Defendant:
Shaun Guthmiller and Ryan Guthmiller
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Robinson v. State of Nebraska et al
as 8:2022cv00276
Plaintiff:
Kirk D. Robinson
Defendant:
State of Nebraska, Ricketts, Doug Peterson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wilkins v. Union Pacific Railroad Company et al
as 8:2022cv00239
Plaintiff:
Ryan D Wilkins and Ryan D. Wilkins
Defendant:
Union Pacific Railroad Company and Leonard Sherer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Clervrain et al v. Fortenberry et al
as 7:2022cv05003
Plaintiff:
Manetirony Clervrain and Wesner Compere
Defendant:
Jeff Fortenberry, Don Bacon, Adrian Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Fagan v. Kelly et al
as 4:2021cv03326
Plaintiff:
Bobbi Lynn Fagan
Defendant:
Sean Kelly, Ryan G. Normon, Michael Olkerbak and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Londo v. Haik et al
as 8:2021cv00421
Plaintiff:
Anthony Londo
Defendant:
Richard Haik, Curtis Sigur, Royal Colbert and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Speirs et al v. Mouth of the South; CBD, LLC et al
as 8:2021cv00298
Plaintiff:
Emily Speirs and M.S.
Defendant:
Mouth of the South; CBD, LLC, Cutchall Management Company, Inc. and Ryan D. Ernst
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Townsell v. Keele
as 8:2021cv00245
Plaintiff:
Makayla Townsell
Defendant:
Ryan Keele
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Cole v. Cotton et al
as 4:2021cv03062
Defendant:
State of Nebraska, Brianna Husmann, Judge Duane Dougherty and others
Plaintiff:
Frankie Levi Cole
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ryan v. Saul
as 8:2021cv00029
Interested Party:
Office of General Counsel Social Security Administration
Defendant:
Andrew M. Saul
Plaintiff:
Ann Ryan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
