Cases 11 - 20 of 994
Doe et al v. Dardanelle School District et al
as 4:2024cv00339
Plaintiff:
Jane Doe and Sally Doe
Defendant:
Dardanelle School District, Arthur J Gallagher & Company - Little Rock, Nicholas Rolando Valls and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - 42:1983 Civil Rights
Ralston v. Jones et al
as 5:2024cv05082
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Wayne Ralston
Defendant:
Judge Casey Jones, Judge Mark Lindsay, Corey Anderson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Spaight v. Union Pacific Railroad Company
as 4:2024cv00302
Plaintiff:
Mark Spaight
Defendant:
Union Pacific Railroad Company
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51 Railways: Fed. Employer's Liability Act
Allstate Insurance Company v. Goings
as 4:2024cv00257
Plaintiff:
Allstate Insurance Company
Defendant:
John Mark Goings
Koontz v. Payne et al
as 2:2024cv00054
Plaintiff:
Morris B Koontz
Defendant:
Dexter Payne, William Straughn, Moses Jackson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01011
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Jennings v. EEOC et al
as 5:2024cv05038
Plaintiff:
Andrew Jennings
Defendant:
EEOC, Fayetteville Police Department, Springdale Police Department and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Counts v. Fallis
as 6:2024cv06011
Plaintiff:
Lee O. Counts, Sr.
Defendant:
Detective Mark Fallis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Stinson v. Yates et al
as 2:2024cv00017
Plaintiff:
Mark T Stinson
Defendant:
John P Yates, Blair, Randle and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Cassity v. Garrett
as 2:2023cv00243
Plaintiff:
Mark Cassity
Defendant:
C Garrett
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
