Cases 11 - 20 of 117
Adams et al v. Target Corporation
as 1:2021cv03352
Plaintiff:
Abraham Drucker, Ian Adams, angela ashby and others
Defendant:
Target Corporation
Cause Of Action: 02 U.S.C. § 431
Muhammad v. Monroe et al
as 6:2021cv06096
Defendant:
Nurse Wilson, Ms. Shiah Don, Nurse Monroe and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Perry Muhammad
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Muhammad v. Conly et al
as 6:2021cv06097
Defendant:
Ms. Shiah Don, Nurse Peacock, Nurse Cook and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Perry Muhammad
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Muhammad v. Conley et al
as 4:2021cv00491
Defendant:
Cook, Peacock, Seamster and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Perry Muhammad
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Perry v. The State of New York et al
as 1:2021cv04163
Defendant:
The State of New York, The Department of Correction and The City of New York
Plaintiff:
Michael Perry
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PERRY v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv15574
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL PERRY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
PERRY v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv15041
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL PERRY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Michael McCarthy, et al v. IAM, et al
as 21-1673
Defendant / Appellee:
INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF MACHINISTS AND AEROSPACE WORKERS and MICHAEL PERRY, President of IAM District Lodge 19
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ROBERT EDDIS and MICHAEL MCCARTHY
Plaintiff:
RANK AND FILE MEMBERS OF IAM DISTRICT LODGE 19
Allen v. Yavapai County Sheriff's Office et al
as 3:2021cv08007
Defendant:
Sheila S Polk, Yavapai County Sheriff's Office, Michael Perry and others
Plaintiff:
Loren Robert Allen
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MCCARTHY v. PERRY et al
as 2:2020cv05486
Defendant:
GLENN JOHNSON and MICHAEL PERRY
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL MCCARTHY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
