Cases 11 - 20 of 38
Lockard et al v. City of Detroit et al
as 2:2018cv13045
Defendant:
Officer Amy Matelic, Arthur Leavells, Sgt. Stephen Geelhood and others
Plaintiff:
Douglas Lockard and Adam Santiago
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 18-11125
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2017cv03030
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Mayo Foundation For Medical Education and Research v. Matel
as 1:2017cv01153
Plaintiff:
Mayo Foundation For Medical Education and Research
Defendant:
Joseph Matel
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 154
ABCDE Operating, LLC v. James Craig, et al
as 17-1712
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ABCDE OPERATING LLC, dba Penthouse Club
Defendant:
JAMES CRAIG
Defendant - Appellee:
CITY OF DETROIT, MI, COMMANDER JOHNNY THOMAS, LIEUTENANT CHARLES FLANAGAN and others
Anthony McCallum, et al v. Stephen Geelhood, et al
as 17-1418
Plaintiff - Appellee:
ANTHONY MCCALLUM and ELAINE MCCALLUM
Defendant - Appellant:
STEPHEN GEELHOOD, AMY MATELIC, BRYAN WATSON and others
Brown v. Barnett et al
as 2:2016cv13451
Defendant:
Larry Barnett, Arthur Leavell, Gregory Tourville and others
Plaintiff:
Edmond W. Brown, Jr.
Katz v. McVeigh et al
as 1:2015cv00338
Defendant:
Maggie Bishop, Paul Boddy, Boston Police Department and others
Plaintiff:
Elena Katz
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
McCallum et al v. Geelhood et al
as 2:2015cv12676
Defendant:
Stephen Geelhood , Amy Matelic , Bryan Watson and others
Plaintiff:
Anthony McCallum and Elaine McCallum
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
McCallum et al v. city of detroit et al
as 2:2015cv12672
Plaintiff:
Anthony McCallum and Elaine McCallum
Defendant:
city of detroit, Stephen Geelhood, Amy Matelic and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
