Cases 11 - 20 of 100
Jinmei Zhang v. City of Chicago Commission on Human Relations, et al
as 26-2850
Plaintiff:
JINMEI ZHANG
Defendant:
CITY OF CHICAGO COMMISSION ON HUMAN RELATIONS and NANCY ANDRADE
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv00436
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Guzman-Andrade v. USA
as 8:2026cv00511
Petitioner:
Javier Guzman-Andrade
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2026cv07541
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Andrade v. Federal Express Corp.
as 2:2026cv03037
Plaintiff:
Eduardo Andrade
Defendant:
Federal Express Corporation
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2 (a) Fair Labor Standards Act
Andrade v. Federal Express Corp.
as 2:2026at01503
Plaintiff:
Eduardo Andrade
Defendant:
Federal Express Corporation
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2 (a) Fair Labor Standards Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2026cv01995
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Shymansky v. State of New York
as 26-2478
Plaintiff:
DEMIA SHYMANSKY and Wyneika Wilburn
Defendant:
STATE OF NEW YORK, CITY OF NEW YORK, NEW YORK CITY POLICE DEPARTMENT and others
Escobar et al v. Officer Austin R. Paredes et al
as 3:2026cv05004
Plaintiff:
Mario Escobar and Bryanna Andrade
Defendant:
Officer Austin R. Paredes, Officer Robert D. Trousas, Officer Noah C. McLemore and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 cv Civil Rights Act - Civil Action for Deprivation of Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2026cv11385
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
