Cases 11 - 20 of 1,213
Orejudos et al v. AT&T Inc
as 3:2024cv01085
Plaintiff:
Rachel Lee Orejudos and Jean Felix
Defendant:
AT&T, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Lim v. New York State Board of Law Examiners et al
as 4:2024cv00398
Plaintiff:
Khor Chin Lim
Defendant:
New York State Board of Law Examiners, City of Chicago, Illinois, Lucien Wong and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Penning v. AT&T Inc.
as 3:2024cv02657
Plaintiff:
Stacy Penning
Defendant:
AT&T Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Property
Telsync Technologies LLC v. AT&T, Inc.
as 2:2024cv00295
Plaintiff:
Telsync Technologies LLC
Defendant:
AT&T, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Schloss et al v. AT&T, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv10656
Plaintiff:
Catherine Schloss, Patricia Tate-Jackson and Darlene Wilson
Defendant:
AT&T, Inc., AT&T Services, Inc., State Street Global Advisors Trust Co. and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Piercy et al v. AT&T Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv10608
Plaintiff:
LaNell Piercy, Willa G. Ward, Thomas L. Mazzeo and others
Defendant:
AT&T Inc., AT&T Services, Inc. and State Street Global Advisors Trust Co.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
WirelessWerx IP, LLC v. AT&T, Inc.
as 2:2024cv00282
Plaintiff:
WirelessWerx IP, LLC
Defendant:
AT&T, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Schaefer v. AT&T, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv01752
Plaintiff:
Brian Schaefer
Defendant:
AT&T, Inc. and AT&T Mobility LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Fiduciary Duty
Kinchen et al v. AT&T Mobility LLC et al
as 3:2024cv02451
Plaintiff:
Mildred Kinchen and James Kinchen
Defendant:
AT&T Mobility LLC and AT&T Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Property
Baah v. AT&T Inc. West, et al.
as 24-2541
Plaintiff:
ALEX BAAH
Defendant:
AT&T INC. WEST, PACIFIC BELL TELEPHONE COMPANY, AT AND T CORP. and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
