Cases 11 - 20 of 25
Penninger v. Indiana Dept of Corrections et al.
as 3:2019cv00295
Defendant:
Indiana Dept of Corrections, J. Rodriguez, John Doe and others
Plaintiff:
Jason D. Penninger
Not Yet Classified:
MIAMI E-FILE(Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Manouchehr Bibiyan v. Marjan Television Network, LTD, a United Kingdom corporation et al
as 2:2019cv03993
Defendant:
TARANEH ENTERPRISES INC., a California corporation, FARIBORZ ABBASSI, CALTEX TRADING, INC., a California corporation and others
Plaintiff:
MANOUCHEHR BIBIYAN
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
PENNINGER v. INDIANA DEPT. OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 1:2019cv01391
Defendant:
ABBASSI, J. RODRIGUEZ, JOHN DOE and others
Plaintiff:
JASON D. PENNINGER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Devine v. Neal et al
as 3:2018cv00995
Defendant:
Timothy Redden, Ron Neal, J. Rodriguez and others
Plaintiff:
Barbara Devine
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Arash Abbassi v. NTSB, et al
as 17-71968
Petitioner:
ARASH ALEX ABBASSI, an individual
Respondent:
NATIONAL TRANSPORTATION SAFETY BOARD and MICHAEL P. HUERTA, Administrator, Federal Aviation Administration,
United States of America v. 378,143.00 In U.S. Currency
as 5:2017cv01159
Defendant:
378,143.00 In U.S. Currency
Claimant:
Wasfi A Abbassi
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Abbassi v. Palisades Collection, LLC et al
as 3:2016cv02427
Plaintiff:
Farhad Abbassi
Defendant:
Palisades Collection, LLC and Law Office of Harris & Zide, LLP.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2016cv05917
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
EMBISCUSO v. ABBASSI et al
as 2:2014cv00644
Plaintiff:
LISA EMBISCUSO
Defendant:
JADAN H. ABBASSI and BUCKS MERCER PAIN & REHABILITATION INSTITUTE, P.C.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Sharp v. Correct Care Solutions et al
as 3:2013cv00056
Plaintiff:
Mark D. Sharp
Defendant:
Correct Care Solutions, Mark Murphy and G. Abbassi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
