Cases 11 - 20 of 29
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2016cv01419
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv00945
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Marin v. URS Corporation et al
as 3:2015cv01383
Defendant:
AECOM Technology Corporation and URS Corporation
Plaintiff:
Kevin Marin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Jansen v. Reliance Standard Life Insurance Company et al
as 2:2014cv02403
Plaintiff:
Sheri Jansen
Defendant:
Reliance Standard Life Insurance Company and AECOM Technology Corporation Long Term Disability Plan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1132
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv02853
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Pierce v. Space and Naval Warfare Systems Command et al
as 3:2013cv02022
Plaintiff:
David Pierce
Defendant:
Space and Naval Warfare Systems Command , Aecom Technology Corporation and Does 1 through 10, inclusive
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Powell et al v. AECOM Technology Corporation et al
as 1:2013cv00866
Plaintiff:
Michael Powell , Nancy Buck and Nicole Smith
Defendant:
AECOM Technology Corporation , AECOM National Security Programs, Inc. and AECOM Government Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv02516
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 13-235
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Hubbard v. AECOM Technology Corporation et al
as 6:2012cv03615
Plaintiff:
Ryan C Hubbard
Defendant:
AECOM Technology Corporation and AECOM Government Services Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition For Removal--Other Contract
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
