Cases 11 - 20 of 51
Lucas v. Lumpkin-Director TDCJ-CID
as 6:2021cv01362
Petitioner:
Alan Lucas
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin-Director TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Lucas v. STATE OF TEXAS et al
as 6:2021cv01033
Plaintiff:
Alan Lucas
Defendant:
STATE OF TEXAS and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Carroll v. Lucas et al
as 2:2021cv00551
Plaintiff:
Michael Carroll
Defendant:
Alan Lucas, John Doe 2 and John Doe 1
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
United of Omaha Life Insurance Company v. terHaar et al
as 8:2020cv00479
Plaintiff:
United of Omaha Life Insurance Company
Defendant:
JoAnn terHaar, Alan Lucas terHaar, Jr. and Reina terHaar-Reyes
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001
Liebing et al v. Sand et al
as 1:2017cv00142
Plaintiff:
Roger Liebing , Gary McCool , Alan Lucas and others
Defendant:
Robert Sand , Kevin Cmelik , Tom J Miller and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Liebing et al v. Sand et al
as 3:2017cv00075
Plaintiff:
Roger Liebing , Gary McCool , Alan Lucas and others
Defendant:
Robert Sand, Kevin Cmelik, Tom J Miller and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lucas v. Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center
as 5:2017cv00109
Plaintiff:
Alan Lucas
Defendant:
Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Covenant Investment Fund, LP, et al v. Sand, et al
as 4:2016cv00419
Plaintiff:
Covenant Investment Fund, LP, Prosapia Capital Management, LLC, Alan Lucas and others
Defendant:
Robert Sand, Kevin Cmelik, Tom Miller and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lucas v. The City of New York et al
as 1:2015cv04678
Defendant:
P.O. Stephen Karabin and The City of New York
Plaintiff:
Alan Lucas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Thomas Janusz, Jr. v. City of Chicago, et al
as 15-1330
Plaintiff - Appellant:
THOMAS M. JANUSZ, JR.
Defendant - Appellee:
CITY OF CHICAGO, ALAN LUCAS, PARRIS GEORGE and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
