Cases 11 - 20 of 23
Government Employees Insurance Co. et al v. Merced et al
as 8:2020cv00802
Defendant:
L.M.T. Yulieta Perez Rodriguez, M.D. Victor Silva, D.C. Brock Mathieson and others
Plaintiff:
Geico Indemnity Co., Geico General Insurance Company, Government Employees Insurance Co. and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
USA v. Cesar Chavira-Madrid
as 19-50693
Defendant / Appellant:
CESAR NOEL CHAVIRA-MADRID, also known as Carlos Gomez-Talvares, also known as Miguel Alexis Garcia-Garcia
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Garcia v. Semple et al
as 3:2018cv01226
Defendant:
Lee, Montefusco, Steven Stebbins and others
Plaintiff:
Carlos Alexis Garcia
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rossi v. Carter et al
as 1:2017cv07434
CPS Supervisor:
Amenda Bunch
Defendant:
Zachary W. Carter, City of New York, David A. Hansell and others
CPS Worker:
Alexis Garcia
Plaintiff:
Joshua Rossi
CFS:
Richard Stockner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
GARCIA HERNANDEZ v. G.C. INSTALLATIONS INC. SOUTH et al
as 1:2017cv20849
Plaintiff:
ALEXIS GARCIA HERNANDEZ
Defendant:
G.C. INSTALLATIONS INC. SOUTH and ANTHONY N. HAJJAR
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0201
GARCIA v. JONES et al
as 3:2017cv00105
Plaintiff:
ALEXIS GARCIA
Defendant:
JULIE JONES, BRYANT, HUTCHINSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Segura v. BP p.l.c. et al
as 2:2016cv04945
Defendant:
BP p.l.c., BP America, Inc., BP Products North America, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Alexis Garcia Segura
Cause Of Action: 33 U.S.C. § 2701
Rojas v. Garda CL Southeast, Inc.
as 1:2013cv23173
Plaintiff:
Arturo Rojas , Edwin R Perez-Feliciano , Alexis Garcia and others
Defendant:
Garda CL Southeast, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Garcia-Rojas v. USA
as 3:2013cv01140
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Alexis Garcia-Rojas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
