Cases 11 - 20 of 239
O'Donnell v. Nicholas et al
as 1:2022cv01762
Plaintiff:
Kelley O'Donnell
Defendant:
Wendy Nicholas, William Frantz, Nicole McKee and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Diaz v. Neal et al
as 3:2022cv00874
Plaintiff:
Rolando L Diaz
Defendant:
Ron D Neal, C Frediarelli, G Page and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
United States of America v. $11,676.00 in U.S. Currency et al
as 3:2022cv01456
Plaintiff:
USA and United States of America
Defendant:
(A) $11,676.00 IN U.S. CURRENCY;, (B) WHITE I-PHONE 12 PRO MAX, IMEI: 354741660136418;, (C) GRAY I-PHONE 12 PRO MAX, IMEI: 354703751610677; and others
Debtor In Possession:
(J)GOLD, I-PHONE 12, IMEI: 354245339595368,
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1341 Complaint for Forfeiture
White v. Florida State Prison et al
as 3:2022cv00677
Plaintiff:
Randy B. White
Defendant:
Florida State Prison, Prock, Tyre and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
White v. Neal et al
as 3:2022cv00411
Plaintiff:
Walter B White, Jr
Defendant:
Ron Neal, Jason Nowatski, Rob Wright and others
Not Classified By Court:
INDIANA STATE PRISON E-FILE (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
White v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration
as 3:2022cv00135
Plaintiff:
Paula B. White
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Interested Party:
SSA General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1383 Review of HHS Decision
Regassa v. Dunbar et al
as 8:2022cv00466
Petitioner:
Admassu Regassa
Respondent:
Warden R.S. Dunbar, AWR Wilson, Ms. B. White and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Paul Isaacson, et al v. Mark Brnovich, et al
as 21-16711
Plaintiff / Appellant:
PAUL A. ISAACSON, M.D., on behalf of himself and his patients, ERIC M. REUSS, M.D., M.P.H,; on behalf of himself and his patients, NATIONAL COUNCIL OF JEWISH WOMEN, INC., Arizona Section and others
Defendant / Appellee:
MARK BRNOVICH, Attorney General, Attorney General of Arizona, in his official capacity, ARIZONA DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH SERVICES, DON HERRINGTON, Interim Director of the Arizona Department of Health Services and others
Defendant:
MICHAEL B. WHITING, County Attorney for Apache County, in his official capacity, BRIAN M. MCINTYRE, County Attorney for Cochise County, in his official capacity, WILLIAM PATRICK RING, County Attorney for Coconino County, in his official capacity and others
Amicus Curiae:
STATE OF MISSOURI, STATE OF ALABAMA, STATE OR ARKANSAS, STATE OF GEORGIA, STATE OF KANSAS, STATE OF IDAHO, STATE OF LOUISIANA, STATE OF MISSISSIPPI, STATE OF MONTANA, STATE OF NEBRASKA, STATE OF OHIO, STATE OF OKLAHOMA, STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA, STATE
Paul Isaacson, et al v. Mark Brnovich, et al
as 21-16645
Plaintiff / Appellee:
PAUL A. ISAACSON, M.D., on behalf of himself and his patients, ERIC M. REUSS, M.D., M.P.H,; on behalf of himself and his patients, NATIONAL COUNCIL OF JEWISH WOMEN, INC., Arizona Section and others
Defendant / Appellant:
MARK BRNOVICH, Attorney General, Attorney General of Arizona, in his official capacity, ARIZONA DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH SERVICES, DON HERRINGTON, Interim Director of the Arizona Department of Health Services and others
Defendant:
MICHAEL B. WHITING, County Attorney for Apache County, in his official capacity, BRIAN M. MCINTYRE, County Attorney for Cochise County, in his official capacity, WILLIAM PATRICK RING, County Attorney for Coconino County, in his official capacity and others
Amicus Curiae:
STATE OF MISSOURI, STATE OF ALABAMA, STATE OR ARKANSAS, STATE OF GEORGIA, STATE OF KANSAS, STATE OF IDAHO, STATE OF LOUISIANA, STATE OF MISSISSIPPI, STATE OF MONTANA, STATE OF NEBRASKA, STATE OF OHIO, STATE OF OKLAHOMA, STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA, STATE
WHITE v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv56438
Plaintiff:
TERRENCE B WHITE
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
