Cases 11 - 20 of 785
Nunez v. David et al
as 5:2023cv00688
Plaintiff:
Andrew Nunez
Defendant:
J. David, B. Jones and J. Hollis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Jones Timms v. Capital One
as 3:2023cv02470
Plaintiff:
Caleb Jones Timms and Caleb B Jones Timms
Defendant:
Capital One
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Breach of Contract
JONES v. O'MALLEY
as 3:2023cv00187
Plaintiff:
LORI B. JONES
Defendant:
KILOLO KIJAKAZI and MARTIN J. O'MALLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
International Brotherhood of Boilermakers, et al v. Jones, et al
as 23-3225
Not Yet Classified:
INTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD OF BOILERMAKERS, IRON SHIPBUILDERS, BLACKSMITHS, FORGERS AND HELPERS, AFL-CIO, J. TOM BACA, officer capacity, TIMOTHY SIMMONS, officer capacity and others
3Rd Party Defendant:
KATERYNA JONES and WILLIAM B. CREEDEN
Haynes v. Wills et al
as 3:2023cv03512
Plaintiff:
Demond Haynes
Defendant:
Anthony Wills, Joshua A. Schoenbeck, Anthony B. Jones and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
JONES v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv11345
Plaintiff:
DANIEL B JONES
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
French v. Wills et al
as 3:2023cv02948
Plaintiff:
Marcellus A. French, Sr.
Defendant:
Anthony Wills, Major Rowland, Joshua A. Schoenbeck and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
JONES et al v. USA
as 1:2023cv01458
Plaintiff:
TODD B. JONES and DEBORAH N. JONES
Defendant:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1491 Tucker Act
JONES et al v. USA
as 1:2023cv01443
Plaintiff:
TODD B. JONES and DEBORAH N. JONES
Defendant:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1491 Tucker Act
Jones v. USA
as 4:2023cv03151
Petitioner:
Walter B. Jones, Jr.
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
