Cases 11 - 20 of 106
Johnson v. Nunez et al
as 1:2023cv00051
Plaintiff:
Alex Bernard Johnson
Defendant:
Juan J. Nunez, Jerry J. Sanchez, Placido Samaniego and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
JOHNSON v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv01214
Plaintiff:
RICHARD BERNARD JOHNSON
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Johnson v. Shinn
as 4:2023cv00004
Petitioner:
John Bernard Johnson
Respondent:
David Shinn and Ryan Thornell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
JOHNSON v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2022cv08030
Plaintiff:
ADONIS BERNARD JOHNSON
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Teri Johnson v. Randee Rewerts
as 22-1437
Petitioner / Appellant:
TERI BERNARD JOHNSON
Respondent / Appellee:
RANDEE REWERTS, Warden
Johnson v. United States of America
as 1:2022cv00430
Plaintiff:
Bernard Johnson
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Abrams et al v. 3M Company et al
as 2:2022cv00027
Defendant:
3M Company, Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Company, AGC Chemicals Americas Inc and others
Plaintiff:
Jesse Abrams, Stanley Albansky, Joseph Alosi and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Abrams et al v. 3M Company et al
as 1:2021cv10539
Plaintiff:
Jesse Abrams, Stanley Albansky, Joseph Alosi and others
Defendant:
3M Company (f/k/a Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing, Co), AGC Chemicals Americas Inc., Amerex Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 nr
Clyde Johnson v. USA
as 21-12977
Petitioner / Appellant:
CLYDE BERNARD JOHNSON
Respondent / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Clyde Johnson v. USA
as 21-12000
Respondent / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Petitioner / Appellant:
CLYDE BERNARD JOHNSON
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
