Cases 11 - 20 of 58
Washington v. NS Consulting, LLC et al
as 8:2022cv00232
Plaintiff:
Brandon Washington
Defendant:
NS Consulting, LLC and Andrew Northwall
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Mick v. Gibbons et al
as 4:2022cv03025
Plaintiff:
P.R. Bryan S. Mick and Bryan S. Mick
Defendant:
Deputy Barrett Gibbons, Deputy Lawrence Stump, Sheriff Dan Osmond and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Unger v. Bockmann, Inc. et al
as 4:2021cv03133
Plaintiff:
Brandon Unger
Defendant:
Bockmann, Inc. and Paul Bockmann
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Brackett v. Horner et al
as 8:2021cv00241
Defendant:
Midland University, Bode Hill, Dave Gillespie and others
Plaintiff:
Brandon M. Brackett
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Benson et al v. Friesen et al
as 4:2020cv03121
Defendant:
Binger Trucking Inc., Andrew L. Friesen, Brandon Stradley and others
Plaintiff:
Fredie E. Benson and Maria T. Benson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1364
Barber v. Frakes et al
as 8:2020cv00282
Defendant:
Dr. Jeffery Kasselman, Dr. Sean Thomas, Dr. Jeff Melvin and others
Plaintiff:
Raysean Barber
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Goodwin v. N.D.C.S. Medical et al
as 4:2019cv03114
Defendant:
Keith P. Hughes, Southwest Lincoln Surgery Center and N.D.C.S. Medical
Plaintiff:
Brandon A. Goodwin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Weathers v. Frakes
as 8:2019cv00296
Petitioner:
Brandon J. Weathers
Respondent:
Scott Frakes
Interested Party:
Nebraska Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Robinson v. Eatherton et al
as 8:2019cv00283
Plaintiff:
Kirk D. Robinson
Defendant:
Patrick Lee, Mike Meffor, Stephen Potter and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Blackbourn v. Medical Guardian, LLC et al
as 8:2019cv00144
Defendant:
GEOFF GROSS, BRANDON CRUZ, MEDICAL GUARDIAN, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
APRIL BLACKBOURN
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 0201
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
