Cases 11 - 20 of 70
Delmo Torrefranca v. Charles Ryan, et al
as 10-17693
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DELMO FIGURA TORREFRANCA
Defendant - Appellee:
CHARLES L. RYAN, Director of ADC at Arizona Department of Correction, DORA B. SCHRIRO, GEO GROUP, INC. and others
Ronald Schaefer v. Mark Bezy, et al
as 10-3222
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RONALD T. SCHAEFER
Defendant - Appellee:
MARK A. BEZY, Warden and DOCTOR WEBSTER
Jenghiz Stewart v. ADOC, et al
as 10-16644
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JENGHIZ K. STEWART
Defendant - Appellee:
ARIZONA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, UNKNOWN BEZY, JACKIE BOUGHTER and others
SCHAEFER v. BEZY
as 1:2010cv00968
Defendant:
MARK A. BEZY
Plaintiff:
RONALD T. SCHAEFER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Tort Claim
Delmo Torrefranca v. Charles Ryan
as 10-15888
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DELMO FIGURA TORREFRANCA
Defendant - Appellee:
CHARLES L. RYAN, Director of ADC at Arizona Department of Correction, DORA B. SCHRIRO, GEO GROUP, INC. and others
James Gross, Sr. v. R.V. Veach, et al
as 09-4137
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMES E. GROSS, SR.
Defendant - Appellee:
R.V. VEACH, former Warden, MARK A. BEZY, Warden, DAVE EBBERTS, ASSO/Warden and others
Torrefranca v. Ryan et al
as 2:2009cv01527
Plaintiff:
Delmo Figura Torrefranca
Defendant:
Charles L Ryan, Dora B Schriro, GEO Group, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ronald G. Bezie v. Anchor Packing Co., et al.
as PAE/2:09-CV-61569
Defendant:
Anchor Packing Co
Plaintiff:
Ronald G. Bezie
BEZIE v. ANCHOR PACKING CO et al
as 2:2009cv61595
Plaintiff:
RONALD G BEZIE
Defendant:
ANCHOR PACKING CO, ACANDS INC, ACANDS INC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
BEZIE v. ANCHOR PACKING CO et al
as 2:2009cv61598
Plaintiff:
RONALD G BEZIE
Defendant:
ANCHOR PACKING CO, ACANDS INC, ACANDS INC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
