Cases 11 - 20 of 31
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00439
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00345
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00149
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00040
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv12191
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
Patel, et al v. Mayorkas, et al
as 3:2022cv00620
Plaintiff:
Vardhman Bharatkumar Patel and Ripal Vardhman Patel
Defendant:
Alejandro Mayorkas, Director Ur M. Jaddou and Merrick Garland
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
PATEL et al v. MAYORKAS et al
as 1:2022cv02776
Plaintiff:
VARDHMAN BHARATKUMAR PATEL and RIPAL VARDHMAN PATEL
Defendant:
ALEJANDRO MAYORKAS, UR M. JADDOU and MERRICK B. GARLAND
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv10803
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
RAJPATH USA LLC et al v. UNITED STATES CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION SERVICES
as 2:2021cv04800
Plaintiff:
HINALBEN BHARATKUMAR PATEL, RAMNJIBHAI UKANI and RAJPATH USA LLC
Defendant:
UNITED STATES CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION SERVICES
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv00034
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
