Cases 11 - 20 of 16,822
Zuko v. Stange
as 1:2024cv00092
Petitioner:
Sokol Zuko
Respondent:
Bill Stange
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Larry Johnson, Sr. v. Lee Coffee, et al
as 24-5468
Plaintiff:
LARRY D. JOHNSON, SR.
Defendant:
LEE V. COFFEE, Assistant District Attorney (former). In individual and official capacity., ARTHUR THOMAS BENNETT, Judge Criminal Court. In individual and official capacity., GWENDOLYN ROOKS, General Sessions Court Judge. Individual capacity and others
Davison v. Smith et al
as 5:2024cv00483
Plaintiff:
Alonzo Gabriel Davison
Defendant:
Clifford J Smith, Scott Rowland, Robert L Hudson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bill Barley v. Blackford County Sheriff's Department, et al
as 24-1829
Plaintiff:
BILL BARLEY
Defendant:
BLACKFORD COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT and BLACKFORD COUNTY SECURITY CENTER
Helton v. Lee et al
as 3:2024cv00588
Plaintiff:
Ricky M. Helton
Defendant:
Governor Bill Lee and David Rausch
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Flemons (PS) v. Gates
as 1:2024cv01316
Plaintiff:
Joanna Flemons
Defendant:
Bill Gates
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
United States v. Alan Bill
as 24-1993
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Alan Bill, also known as Vend0r, also known as KingdomOfficial
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv03557
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
MacDonald et al v. Johnson et al
as 3:2024cv00372
Plaintiff:
Kinley MacDonald, AJ, BM and others
Defendant:
Daniel Johnson, Bruce Kile, Bar Counsel Members and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00213
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
