Cases
Cases 11 - 20 of 179
Vang v. Catawba Medical Center et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2023cv00018
Plaintiff: Pakuja Crystal Vang
Defendant: Catawba Medical Center, Catawba Valley Family Medicine Claremont, Bethany Medical Center and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Russell, James v. Blue Cross and Blue Shield of North Carolina
as 3:2022cv00691
Plaintiff: James Russell
Defendant: Blue Cross and Blue Shield of North Carolina
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A. - Employee Benefits
STARK v. BLUE CROSS AND BLUE SHIELD OF NORTH CAROLINA FOUNDATION et al
as 1:2023cv00022
Plaintiff: ALEXANDRA STARK
Defendant: BLUE CROSS AND BLUE SHIELD OF NORTH CAROLINA FOUNDATION and CHANGE HEALTHCARE INC
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Bed Bath & Beyond Inc. et al v. Anthem Inc et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2022cv01256
Plaintiff: Bed Bath & Beyond Inc., Automobile Club of Southern California, Darling Ingredients Inc and others
Defendant: Anthem Inc d/b/a ANthem Blue Cross LIfe and Health Insurance Company agent of WELLPOINT INC, Blue Cross of California, Blue Cross of Southern California and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Insurance Contract
S. v. Blue Cross and Blue Shield of North Carolina et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2022cv00235
Plaintiff: Albert S.
Defendant: Blue Cross and Blue Shield of North Carolina, North Carolina Bar Association Health Benefit Trust and Lawyers Insurance Agency, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
M. et al v. SAS Institute et al
as 5:2022cv00268
Defendant: SAS Institute, SAS Institute Inc. Medical Plan and Blue Cross and Blue Shield of North Carolina
Plaintiff: Thomas M. and E. M.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
In Re Blue Cross Blue Shield Antitrust Litigation MDL 2406
as 2:2013cv20000
Plaintiff: Plaintiffs' Counsel, Plaintiffs' Liaison Counsel, Judy Sheridan and others
Defendant: Anthem, Inc., BCBSM, Inc.,, Blue Cross Blue Shield Association and others
Special Master: Special Master
In Re: Blue Cross Blue Shield Antitrust Litigation MDL 2406
Respondent: Baycare Health System, Inc.
Amicus Curiae: U.S. Department of Labor
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
M. et al v. SAS Institute et al
as 2:2022cv00297
Plaintiff: Thomas M. and E. M.
Defendant: SAS Institute the SAS Institute Inc. Medical Plan and Blue Cross Blue Shield of North Carolina, Blue Cross and Blue Shield of North Carolina, SAS Institute and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
Metropolitan Transportation Authority et al v. Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Alabama et al
as 2:2022cv00265
Defendant: Anthem Inc formerly known as WELLPOINT INC doing business as Anthem Blue Cross Life and Health Insurance Company doing business as Blue Cross of California doing business as BLUE CROSS OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA doing business as Blue Cross of Northern C, Independence Health Group Inc and Independence Hospital Indemnity Plan Inc, Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Alabama and others
Plaintiff: Metropolitan Transportation Authority, New York City Transit Authority, Manhattan And Bronx Surface Transit Operating Authority and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
Hoover et al v. Blue Cross and Blue Shield Association et al
as 2:2022cv00261
Defendant: Highmark Inc doing business as Blueshield of Northeastern New York formerly known as HealthNow Systems, Inc. formerly known as HealthNow New York Inc, Blue Cross and Blue Shield Association, Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Florida Inc and others
Plaintiff: John Hoover, Sharon Zebley, Erick Gibbs and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Anti-trust

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?