Cases 11 - 20 of 863
Vaughan et al v. The 3M Company et al
as 1:2024cv03084
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Vaughan, Dominic Pagliuso, Ralph Hensley II and others
Defendant:
The 3M Company, AGC Chemicals Americas, Inc., Amerex Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 nr Notice of Removal
Watford et al v. The 3M Company et al
as 1:2024cv03085
Plaintiff:
Joseph Watford, Kenneth Vaughan, Greg Vanhooser and others
Defendant:
The 3M Company, AGC Chemicals Americas Inc., Amerex Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 nr Notice of Removal
Bynum v. City of Bridgton MO. et al
as 4:2024cv00572
Plaintiff:
Darryl R. Bynum
Defendant:
City of Bridgton MO. and St. Louis County Judicial System
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. Bynum (INMATE 2)
as 1:2024cv00234
Plaintiff:
Thomas C. Williams
Defendant:
Mason Bynum
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Bynum v. Life Insurance Company of North America
as 1:2024cv21377
Plaintiff:
Harold Bynum
Defendant:
Life Insurance Company of North America
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Bynum v. State of North Carolina
as 5:2024hc02049
Petitioner:
Adrian Bynum
Respondent:
State of North Carolina
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Bynum v. State of New Jersey
as 2:2024cv01720
Petitioner:
Felicia Bynum
Respondent:
STATE OF NEW JERSEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
MCCOY v. USA et al
as 1:2024cv04308
Plaintiff:
TERRY MCCOY
Defendant:
USA, USA BUREAU OF PRISONS, FORT DIX FCI and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
STALLWORTH v. BYNUM et al
as 5:2024cv00062
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER E STALLWORTH
Defendant:
D L BYNUM, GLENN HANCOCK and T BOWDEN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
