Cases 11 - 20 of 36
CHILDRE v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv73393
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
DANIEL CHILDRE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
(PC) Dustin v. Childres, et al.
as 1:2020cv00422
Defendant:
Welch, Harry, Atkinson and others
Plaintiff:
D. Dustin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dustin v. Childres et al
as 4:2020cv01899
Defendant:
Welch, Harry, Atkinson and others
Plaintiff:
D. Dustin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Soliz v. Shelton et al
as 7:2020cv00036
Defendant:
Eddy Shelton, Dale Childres, Armando Rodriguez and others
Plaintiff:
Raul Adame Soliz, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Soliz v. Shelton et al
as 5:2020ct03054
Defendant:
Eddy Shelton, Dale Childres, Armando Rodriguez and others
Plaintiff:
Raul Adame Soliz, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Spin Master Ltd. et al v. The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule "A"
as 1:2018cv04368
Defendant:
The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule "A", wowshopers, yuexin439 store and others
Plaintiff:
Spin Master, Inc. and Spin Master Ltd.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114
Childres v. Sanofi US Services Inc. et al
as 2:2018cv06005
Plaintiff:
Patricia Childres
Defendant:
Sanofi-Aventis U.S. LLC and Sanofi US Services Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Holmes v. Cartwright et al
as 3:2017cv01322
Plaintiff:
Gregory L Holmes
Defendant:
Shelle Cartwright, Lisa Creason, Kent E Brookmen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Holmes v. Cartwright et al
as 2:2017cv02302
Plaintiff:
Gregory L Holmes
Defendant:
Shelle Cartwright, Lisa Creason, Kent E Brookmen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Childre v. Sheriff Darryl Daniels et al
as 6:2017cv01560
Plaintiff:
Katie Childre
Defendant:
Sheriff Darryl Daniels and Terrel Singletary
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 2721
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
