Cases 11 - 20 of 21
Taylor v. Smith et al
as 1:2019cv00903
Plaintiff:
Cornelius Taylor
Defendant:
Superintendent Barry Smith and Dr. Mobology
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
TAYLOR v. COMONWEALTH OF PA et al
as 2:2019cv00603
Respondent:
COMONWEALTH OF PA, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF DELAWARE and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Petitioner:
CORNELIUS TAYLOR
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
TAYLOR v. SMITH et al
as 3:2019cv00014
Plaintiff:
CORNELIUS TAYLOR
Defendant:
SUPERINTENDENT BARRY SMITH and DR. (JOHN DOE) MOBALATI
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2017cv00535
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Intervenor_plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Intervenor_defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
USA v. Marquis Taylor
as 12-5647
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
MARQUIS CORNELIUS TAYLOR, aka Nathan Truitt, aka Marquis Cornelius Hall, aka Devine Blake, aka Jessie Eugene Barrow, aka Gerald Baker
USA v. Marquis Taylor
as 12-5647
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
MARQUIS CORNELIUS TAYLOR, aka Nathan Truitt, aka Marquis Cornelius Hall, aka Devine Blake, aka Jessie Eugene Barrow, aka Gerald Baker
Taylor v. Bingham et al
as 3:2011cv00260
Plaintiff:
Cornelius Taylor
Defendant:
Margaret Bingham, Earnest Lee, Rufus Burkes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
TAYLOR v. PHILA. PRISON SYSTEM et al
as 2:2010cv05263
Plaintiff:
CORNELIUS TAYLOR
Defendant:
PHILA. PRISON SYSTEM and CURRAN-FROMHOLD CORRECTIONAL FACILITY (CFCF)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MCCALL v. YOUNG et al
as 2:2010cv04058
Plaintiff:
PURNELL MCCALL
Defendant:
VINCENT YOUNG and CORNELIUS TAYLOR
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cornelius Taylor v. State of Mississippi, et al
as 09-60825
Petitioner - Appellant:
CORNELIUS TAYLOR
Respondent - Appellee:
STATE OF MISSISSIPPI and JACKIE PARKER
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
