Cases 11 - 20 of 37
Smith v. Luther et al
as 1:2020cv01621
Defendant:
Sec. Wetzel, Perrigo(R) Manufacturer, Clay Pharmaceutical and others
Plaintiff:
Lavon Cecil Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SMITH et al v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
as 3:2020cv11434
In Re:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON TALCUM POWDER PRODUCTS MARKETING, SALES PRACTICES AND PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER INC., PERSONAL CARE PRODUCTS COUNCIL (PCPC) and JOHNSON & JOHNSON
Plaintiff:
CECIL SMITH and THE ESTATE OF SANDRA MARIE SMITH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
SMITH et al v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
as 3:2020cv11420
Plaintiff:
CECIL SMITH and THE ESTATE OF SANDRA MARIE SMITH
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER INC., PERSONAL CARE PRODUCTS COUNCIL (PCPC) and JOHNSON & JOHNSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Smith v. Robinowitz et al
as 3:2019cv01955
Plaintiff:
Cecil Smith
Defendant:
Charles Robinowitz and Law Offices of Charles Robinowitz
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Davis v. City of Sanford Police Department et al
as 6:2017cv00262
Plaintiff:
Gary D. Davis
Defendant:
City of Sanford Police Department, Cecil Smith, Bill Erwin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
James Coleman v. Lincoln Parish Detention Ctr, et al
as 16-30109
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMES COLEMAN
Defendant - Appellee:
LINCOLN PARISH DETENTION CENTER, ANNA RAWSON, JIM TUTEN and others
Lavon Smith, Jr. v. Superintendent Pittsburgh SCI, et al
as 15-4070
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LAVON CECIL SMITH, JR.
Defendant - Appellee:
SUPERINTENDENT PITTSBURGH SCI and ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA
SMITH v. CAPOZZA et al
as 2:2015cv01449
Petitioner:
LAVON CECIL SMITH
Respondent:
MARK CAPOZZA and KATHLEEN KANE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
In re: Lavon Smith, Jr.
as 15-3295
Petitioner:
In re: LAVON CECIL SMITH, JR.
Respondent:
DISTRICT ATTORNEY ALLEGHENY COUNTY
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2015cv02117
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
