Cases 11 - 18 of 18
CLARK et al v. WAL-MART STORES INC et al
as 5:2015cv00276
Plaintiff:
LEAH NICOLE CLARK , MIKEAL CHAD CLARK , BROOKLYN P CLARK and others
Defendant:
WAL-MART STORES EAST INC and THOMAS DOE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Clark et al v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.
as 5:2015cv00274
Plaintiff:
Leah Nicole Clark and Mikeal Chad Clark
Defendant:
Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Clark et al v. Michelin North America Inc
as 5:2013cv02291
Plaintiff:
Leah Nicole Clark , Michael Chad Clark , Brooklyn P Clark and others
Defendant:
Michelin North America Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2013cv01408
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
American Contractors Indemnity v. Carolina Realty and Developmen
as 12-1952
Plaintiff - Appellant:
AMERICAN CONTRACTORS INDEMNITY COMPANY
Defendant - Appellee:
CAROLINA REALTY AND DEVELOPMENT COMPANY INCORPORATED, JOHN PAUL BAEHR, KIMBERLY BAEHR and others
Defendant:
MILLICENT BOZEMAN, WILLIAM S. BOZEMAN, CHAD CLARK and others
Coleman v. Salem, NH, Town of, et al.
as 1:2010cv00132
Defendant:
Chad Clark, Paul T. Donovan and Salem, NH, Town of
Plaintiff:
Dillon Coleman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
LeBlanc v. New Orleans City et al
as 2:2009cv06288
Plaintiff:
Stanley Martin LeBlanc
Defendant:
New Orleans City, New Orleans Police Department, Jason Cross and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
American Contractors Indemnity Company v. Carolina Realty and Development Company Inc et al
as 7:2009cv02145
Plaintiff:
American Contractors Indemnity Company
Defendant:
Carolina Realty and Development Company Inc, John Paul Baehr, Kimberly Baehr and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
