Cases 11 - 20 of 32
Pickett v. Corizon Health (INMATE 2)
as 2:2017cv00739
Plaintiff:
Edward Charles Pickett
Defendant:
Corizon Health
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Alday v. Mitchell et al
as 3:2016cv00222
Plaintiff:
Alex Trevor Alday
Defendant:
Bilbo Mitchell, Philip S. Weinberg and Charles Pickett
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pickett et al v. Boston Scientific Corporation
as 2:2013cv00668
Plaintiff:
Aurelia Pickett and Charles Pickett
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Pickett v. Montgomery County Jail et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2012cv00986
Plaintiff:
Edward Charles Pickett
Defendant:
Montgomery County Jail and Montgomery County Jail Nurse Station
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Norman Pickett, Jr. v. Sacramento Superior Court, et al
as 12-16942
Plaintiff - Appellant:
NORMAN CHARLES PICKETT, Jr.
Defendant - Appellee:
SACRAMENTO SUPERIOR COURT and KATE JOHNSON
Pickett v. Repasky
as 3:2012cv03384
Plaintiff:
Norman Charles Pickett, Jr.
Defendant:
T. Repasky
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Norman Pickett, Jr. v. R. Zamora, et al
as 12-56137
Plaintiff - Appellant:
NORMAN CHARLES PICKETT, Jr.
Defendant - Appellee:
R. A. ZAMORA, individual capacity, J. JAVAUX, individual capacity and M. VELA, individual capacity
Norman Pickett, Jr. v. T. Repasky, et al
as 12-16200
Plaintiff - Appellant:
NORMAN CHARLES PICKETT, Jr.
Defendant - Appellee:
T. REPASKY, Dentist, Y. OLIVAS, Appeals Coordinator, L. D. ZAMORA, Appeal Coordinator and others
Pickett v. Sacramento Superior Court et al
as 2:2011cv02321
Plaintiff:
Norman Charles Pickett, Jr.
Defendant:
Sacramento Superior Court and Kate Johnston
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pickett v. Repasky et al
as 3:2011cv04367
Plaintiff:
Norman Charles Pickett, Jr.
Defendant:
T. Repasky, Y. Olivas, L. D. Zamora and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
