Cases 11 - 20 of 70
Garabedian v. Waterbury
as 3:2022cv00623
Plaintiff:
Garo Garabedian
Defendant:
City of Waterbury
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family & Medical Leave Act
Cruz v. Waterbury et al
as 3:2022cv00502
Plaintiff:
Emmanuel Cruz
Defendant:
City of Waterbury and Retirement Board of the City of Waterbury
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Richardson v. McMahon
as 22-582
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Jewu Richardson
Defendant / Appellee:
James McMahon, City of Waterbury, Edward Mills and others
Defendant:
Rivera, Police Officer, Individual and Official Capacities, Querino Maia, Sgt., Individual and Official Capacities, Vernon Riddick, Chief, Individual and Official Capacities and others
Greene v. Waterbury Police Dept et al
as 3:2021cv01513
Plaintiff:
Edward Greene
Defendant:
Waterbury Police Dept, James McMahon, Paul Charette and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Keels v. Waterbury et al
as 3:2021cv00750
Plaintiff:
James Keels
Defendant:
City of Waterbury and Michale Richards
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Campbell v. Waterbury et al
as 3:2021cv00107
Defendant:
Avenue Auto Sales, Inc, Chief of Police Fernando Spagnolo, Sgt. Kenneth Keroack and others
Plaintiff:
Tacara Campbell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Habib et al v. Farley et al
as 3:2019cv02023
Defendant:
Officer Lee Farley, Sargent Matthew Benoit, City of Waterbury and others
Plaintiff:
Steven J White and Michael J Habib
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2019cv01614
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Richardson v. McMahon et al
as 3:2019cv00707
Defendant:
Querino Maia, Rivera, City of Waterbury and others
Plaintiff:
Jewu Richardson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Garcia-Ortiz v. Waterbury et al
as 3:2019cv00426
Defendant:
John Doe and City of Waterbury
Plaintiff:
Leroy Garcia-Ortiz
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
