Cases 11 - 20 of 35
Pesante v. Semple et al
as 3:2017cv01070
Plaintiff:
Jose Pesante
Defendant:
Semple, Arnone, Cepelak and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Licari v. Semple et al
as 3:2017cv00976
Plaintiff:
Randal Licari
Defendant:
Semple, Arnone, Cepelak and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Claudio v. Semple et al
as 3:2017cv00955
Plaintiff:
Luis Claudio
Defendant:
Lieutenant Semple, Arnone, Cepelak and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Babulsky v. Semple et al
as 3:2017cv00865
Plaintiff:
James Babulsky
Defendant:
Semple, Arnone, Cepelak and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
TeekaSingh v. Semple et al
as 3:2017cv00694
Plaintiff:
Osbert TeekaSingh
Defendant:
Semple, Arnone, Cepelak and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kaminski et al v. Coulter et al
as 2:2015cv12810
Plaintiff:
Cheryl N. Kaminski , Lincoln Park Police and Fire Retirees Association, Inc. , Michael J. Moulios and others
Defendant:
Brad L. Coulter , R. Kevin Clinton, Thomas E. Karnes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Appiah v. Dean et al
as 1:2014cv09246
Plaintiff:
Douglas Jhonson Appiah
Defendant:
Robert S. Dean, Elaine E. Friedman, Lisa A. Packard and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Evans et al v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.
as 1:2014cv02276
Plaintiff:
Daryl Evans, Twila Adair, Amy Adamson and others
Defendant:
JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1362 E.R.I.S.A.: Liability for Termination of Single Employer Plans
Culter et al v. Boston Scientific Corporation
as 2:2014cv11765
Plaintiff:
Judith Culter and Michael Culter
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Pierson et al v. Boston Scientific Corporation
as 2:2013cv32376
Plaintiff:
Janice Pierson , Janet Plasse , Karen Coleman and others
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
