Cases 11 - 20 of 64
RHODES v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv17286
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
JOHN D. RHODES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
(PC) Hollins v. Rhodes et al
as 1:2020cv00775
Defendant:
D. Rhodes, N. Welch, S. Taporo and others
Plaintiff:
Donald E Hollins and Donald E. Hollins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
(PC) Hollins v. Rhodes, et al.
as 1:2020cv00692
Defendant:
S Tapord, D. Rhodes, N. Welch and others
Plaintiff:
Donald E Hollins and Donald E. Hollins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
RHODES v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv70065
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
JOHN D RHODES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
RHODES v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv13314
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
BLAKE D RHODES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Montague Walker v. Pennsylvania Department of Cor
as 19-3062
Defendant / Appellee:
SHELLY MANKEY, PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, an agency of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, DANIELLE TERNITSKY-GORDON and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MONTAGUE WALKER
Not Yet Classified:
THE BEASLEY LAW FIRM and ALVIN F. DE LEVIE
Bobbitt et al v. Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
as 1:2018cv11886
Plaintiff:
Richard Solomon, Joseph Scattareggia, Kevin Skinner and others
Defendant:
Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1605
RHODES v. ASTRAZENECA LP. et al
as 2:2018cv13774
Defendant:
ASTRAZENECA LP. and ASTRAZENECA PHARMACEUTICALS LP
Plaintiff:
ROBIN D. RHODES
In Re:
PROTON-PUMP INHIBITOR PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION (NO.II)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
United States of America v. Rhodes et al
as 1:2018cv01399
Defendant:
Holly D. Rhodes and John L. Rhodes
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1471
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
