Cases 11 - 20 of 70
Fernandez v. Jones et al
as 3:2021cv00522
Plaintiff:
Kevin Fernandez
Defendant:
Dawn Jones, J. Carpenter and S. Ray
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Glosson v. Jones et al
as 4:2021cv00690
Plaintiff:
Dominique Glosson
Defendant:
Dawn Jones, LPN and Sammy Bowden
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cranford v. State of Nevada et al
as 3:2021cv00386
Plaintiff:
Keishawn Cranford
Defendant:
State of Nevada, NDOC, Charles Daniels and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Estes v. Jones et al
as 3:2021cv00214
Defendant:
Carpenter, Dawn Jones and Nurse Carpenter
Plaintiff:
Michael Estes
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wood v. Frederick et al
as 1:2021cv01169
Defendant:
Casey Carter Santas, Brandon L. Peak, Christopher Sutton Connelly and others
Plaintiff:
L. Lin Wood, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JONES v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
as 3:2020cv17328
In Re:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON TALCUM POWDER PRODUCTS MARKETING, SALES PRACTICES AND PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
Plaintiff:
DAWN JONES
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER INC, JOHNSON & JOHNSON and PERSONAL CARE PRODUCTS COUNCIL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
USA v. Misty Jones
as 20-6177
Defendant / Appellant:
MISTY DAWN JONES, aka Misti Hurst-Holloway, aka Misti A. Hollaway, aka Misty Dawn Laton, aka Misty Hodges, aka Misty Dawn Bacon, aka Misty Dawn Hollaway-Venett, aka Misty Dawn Hurst, aka Misty Dawn Hodges, aka Misty Dawn Holloway
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Thomas v. Hanf et al
as 3:2020cv00487
Defendant:
Autumn Snow, Dr. Ted Hanf, Dawn Jones and others
Plaintiff:
Marlo D. Thomas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Thacker v. Jones et al
as 2:2020cv01440
Defendant:
Martin, Gloria Carpenter, Manalang and others
Plaintiff:
Richard Thacker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Birch v. Carpenter et al
as 3:2020cv00423
Plaintiff:
Bruce Birch
Defendant:
Dawn Jones and Gloria Carpenter
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
