Cases 11 - 20 of 35
Wolf et al v. Cordis Corporation et al
as 3:2017cv01321
Plaintiff:
Sharlene Wolf , Charmaine Bacon , John Beshears and others
Defendant:
Cordis Corporation and Confluent Medical Technologies, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Townsend v. Colorado Department, et al
as 16-1141
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JUVENCIA DARSHA TOWNSEND
Defendant - Appellee:
COLORADO DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, EVERINGHAM, ROACH and others
Deets v. C. R. Bard, Inc.
as 2:2015cv11786
Plaintiff:
Diana M. Deets
Defendant:
C. R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 15-1411
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Deets v. C. R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2014cv29191
Plaintiff:
Jane K. Deets
Defendant:
C. R. Bard, Inc. and Tissue Science Laboratories Limited
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Townsend v. Colorado department of Corrections et al
as 1:2014cv02961
Plaintiff:
Juvencia Darsha Townsend
Defendant:
Colorado department of Corrections, Roatch, Traxles and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Townsend v. Eliot et al
as 1:2014cv02962
Plaintiff:
Juvencia Townsend
Defendant:
Kimberly Eliot, Mark Altholz, McFee and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Deets v. Lincoln National Life Insurance Company
as 3:2014cv01473
Plaintiff:
Ashley Deets
Defendant:
Lincoln National Life Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001
Deets et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2014cv01436
Plaintiff:
Etta Deets and Wallace Deets
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. , Ethicon, LLC and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Deets v. National Railroad Passenger Corporation aka AMTRAK et al
as 1:2013cv02219
Plaintiff:
Frances Marion Deets
Defendant:
National Railroad Passenger Corporation and Tac Transportation, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
